The idea of a tunnel to replace Seattle's waterfront freeway appears dead after the governor and key legislators rejected the latest proposal. So now what?
The state says it demands action because the existing viaduct -- a state highway -- could collapse. If that's true, then it should immediately begin working on ways to handle the existing traffic and begin closing the road.
Unfortunately the only apparent action is more debate. Why not invest existing funds in improved roads and transit? Don't waste time and money on advisory votes or a protracted fight between Seattle and the state over a new viaduct.